What Rhys Davies argued
Rhys accepted that INTERPOL’s notice system does a great deal of good work, but said it would be naive to assume it works perfectly. The Red Notice system has been called “the autocrat’s sniper rifle”: a long-range targeting tool that is devastating in the wrong hands.
He identified two problems. The first is what gets into the system: garbage in, garbage out. Some states target dissidents and business rivals on an almost institutional scale, while others pay little attention to the quality of their data. The second is delay. The CCF works to a target of one month to decide admissibility and nine months to decide a deletion request. Rhys could not think of one of our cases that had met that timetable.
The aim of an abusive notice is often to grind a person down rather than to secure extradition. One of our pro bono clients was targeted because of a rivalry between two families. He has been stuck in Lebanon for eighteen months and has never met his daughter. A Red Notice does not need to lead to an arrest to do its harm.
Rhys also pointed to the lack of a clear, published body of CCF precedent, because decisions are heavily redacted. His proposals were more resources for the CCF, closer scrutiny before notices are published, and more pressure from the democratic states that fund much of INTERPOL for a more transparent system.